Some people believe that Revelation is to be taken figuratively. As Les Feldick says, people don't want to accept that fantastic things will happen during the tribulation. The way I understand it, some things are to be taken figuratively- the things which say "like unto" or some such. But not always.
The verses below mention a bottomless pit (pause), with smoke ascending like unto a furnace. That does not qualify the entire line to be a metaphor, only the smoke. Which is like a furnace. To wit, it does not say "something like unto a bottomless pit." It says, literally, a bottomless pit. Not a bottomless-esque pit. "Like unto" is not a blanket term for the entire verse/chapter/book.
Right now, I am reading a site which teaches that the "locusts" are helicopters, written by some dude who thinks he's the prophet Elijah. Also, he thinks the Quran and Bible fit perfectly together. Weirdo. He has not updated his site since October of last year. I'm not grouping those who believe the locusts are helicopters with this stooge. I'm just using him as an example. I'm not a Bible scholar, but I do have half a brain and a lick of sense.
According to him, we are already in the tribulation- we were part-way through the tribulation in 1986 (the Chernobyl-being-translated-wormwood thing)! Wow. 1986 is the year the original Metroid was released in Japan, but I don't know about the tribulation going on during that time.
Let's start with the first two verses:
1 And the fifth angel sounded, and I saw a star fall from heaven unto the earth: and to him was given the key of the bottomless pit.(all quotes KJV) According to Willy, this is the Gulf War invasion of Kuwait, when coalition (USA) forces did their thing. Willy really starts getting slippery here, as he does not translate for us farm boys why the angel is given the key to the bottomless pit (or oil field). Even if "given the key" is a metaphor for "indwelt Saddam," it does not fit. Not unless you're paranoid. As I mentioned above, it does not say "like unto a bottomless pit." It says, literally, a bottomless pit. The bottomless pit- not a.
2 And he opened the bottomless pit; and there arose a smoke out of the pit, as the smoke of a great furnace; and the sun and the air were darkened by reason of the smoke of the pit.
Next, Revelation 9: 3-5:
3 And there came out of the smoke locusts upon the earth: and unto them was given power, as the scorpions of the earth have power.
4 And it was commanded them that they should not hurt the grass of the earth, neither any green thing, neither any tree; but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads.
Verse 3: --points to demonic locusts, of course- let out of the bottomless pit. They have their king over them- Abaddon in Hebrew, Apollyon in Greek, meaning the Destroyer (I don't speak or read Jew or Greek, this is what I am told). No, I assure you, it is not me. It's an entirely different destroyer. He is mentioned in verse 11. They are given power as the scorpions of the earth have power. Later, it is clarified; they sting.
But Willy doesn't think so. He thinks they are helicopters- the "sting" is their tail rotor (what?). He believes the oil wells being on fire caused the smoke, and then the helicopters/forces came as a result. Strange John does not mention an army, nor does he mention airplanes (wouldn't airplanes be around too?).
Verse 4: --the locusts are commanded not to harm any plant life. Only the men who do not have the seal of God in their foreheads (Rev. 7: 1-8). Wet Willy thinks this mark is the telepathic bond of man with God- or believers with God. But, the plant life.
There are several problems with this verse and Willy's ever-slippery interpretation, like oil to water. Willy is the oil.
I don't think apache pilots were commanded to not destroy any plant life. In fact, the question is, if these are not literal locusts, why would they be commanded not to harm any plant life? If these were actually helicopters, why would they be told to go against a locust's natural course of living- "destroying" plant life? Why would it matter, if this is just figurative? This is a valid question no matter how slippery Willy is. Being slippery might make it hard to catch someone, but it doesn't make it hard to chase them. It makes it harder for them to run. Slipping...sliding.
Note that it doesn't say that they didn't destroy any plant life. It says that they were commanded not to destroy any plant life. Why would you order a helicopter not to destroy any plant life? Also, how could a helicopter tell the difference between one with the seal of God and a normal person?
Why would that verse backing up that these are literal locusts be there if they were helicopters? Getting a little slippery, eh, Willy? Well, he says that we used all sorts of damaging things in old wars, but now we have precision bombs. OK, it still doesn't say they -didn't-, it says they were -commanded not to-.
5 And to them it was given that they should not kill them, but that they should be tormented five months: and their torment was as the torment of a scorpion, when he striketh a man.
OK, no matter how slippery Willy is, he can't slip out of this one. Or can he?
After all, since when was it a directive at that time not to kill anyone? If you're in an Apache GUNSHIP, you're going to kill. You don't land an apache and walk after people on foot. If you are in an apache helicopter, and you can get the thing to float off of the pavement, someone's gonna die.
According to Wet Willy the Slippery, the apache perfectly fits the description given in Revelation 9: 7-9 (10 later):
7 And the shapes of the locusts were like unto horses prepared unto battle; and on their heads were as it were crowns like gold, and their faces were as the faces of men.Verse 7 sounds like a helicopter- sure. But crowns of gold? Willy thinks the crowns of gold were the rotors reflecting sunlight. Whatever. Why would John say the back rotors are stings, and the top rotor is a crown of gold? Wouldn't the top rotor be a giant sting?
8 And they had hair as the hair of women, and their teeth were as the teeth of lions.
9 And they had breastplates, as it were breastplates of iron; and the sound of their wings was as the sound of chariots of many horses running to battle.
Verse 8 does not work at all. According to Willy, this means that womens hair is a covering. That is in fact true about a womans hair. I Corinthians 11: 15:
15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for her hair is given her for a covering.Willy uses the word here "covering." Notice John did not say "had a covering like unto a woman's hair." He said "hair as the hair of women." He didn't say "covering as the hair of women." He claims that these "coverings" were the camouflage netting that they apparently put onto helicopters when they landed.
John didn't say "sometimes" they had hair as the hair of women. Or "when they landed."
He then claims that the "teeth as the teeth of lions" are the teeth you sometimes see painted on helicopters. That's easy to claim. But it doesn't make any sense when you think about it. The breastplate is also easy, and so is the "sound of many chariots."
However, then it comes to verse 10.
10 And they had tails like unto scorpions, and there were stings in their tails: and their power was to hurt men five months.After "and there were stings in their tails" there is a colon. That means he is going into more detail. Then it says "and their power was to hurt men five months." I don't know how the tail rotors could have hurt men 5 months. Maybe if someone was hit by it (was anyone ever hit by the tail rotor of an apache?). But it doesn't say that- it implies that the stings effect a lot of people, not one unfortunate helicopter repairman who got decapitated.
Verse 4 says "but only those men which have not the seal of God in their foreheads." I could be wrong, but I interpret this as meaning worldwide, or semi-worldwide. It's not so hard to believe, as a third of mankind gets wiped out within the next 14 verses, but I admit I don't know.
Now for verse 11, the last one of this judgment:
11 And they had a king over them, which is the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in the Hebrew tongue is Abaddon, but in the Greek tongue hath his name Apollyon.According to Willy, the "angel of the bottomless pit" is Satan. And Saddam was just Satan's puppet like hitler or stalin, he explains excitedly. So, Saddam was being used, as a puppet of Satan...to command our apache helicopters.
I think I can just end this abruptly right here.
[end transmission]